| | | Transition Finance Weekly |
| Exploring the policy, politics, and economics of the clean energy transition |
| Welcome to Transition Finance Weekly — a new weekly newsletter from Pleiades Strategy. Each week, we’ll summarize the top stories and trends related to the policy, politics, and economics of the clean energy transition in the states.
This is our first issue, and we want to hear from you. What would you like to see in this newsletter? What kinds of developments do you need us to track? You can reach us at newsletter@pleiadesstrategy.com.
If someone forwarded you this email, sign up here. |
| | 1. Hyundai’s Georgia EV Investment Will Reap Clean Energy Dividends And Create 14,500 Georgia Jobs |
| | | 2. Meanwhile, In Oklahoma, Power Customers Are Paying A Steep Surcharge For Unreliable Fossil Fuel Generation |
| | | 3. Anti-Woke Stock Exchange Launches In Texas, To Weak Corporate Response |
| BlackRock and Citadel are backing TXSE, a new Dallas-based stock exchange pitched to CEOs who want to bypass NYSE and NASDAQ fees and rules, including disclosure requirements and board diversity policies. Texas Governor Greg Abbott claimed that the exchange would allow companies to avoid “policy decisions made from the left.” Meanwhile, Abbott’s anti-ESG bans have cost the state nearly $700M in lost economic output and 3,000 jobs. The exchange’s leadership were not subtle in their situating the TXSE within ongoing culture wars, saying that the exchange aims to be “CEO-friendly,” which some took as a nod to controversial corporate leaders like Elon Musk. Industry response has been skeptical.
|
| | 4. Congressional Republicans Confuse Collusion, Collaboration, Convening, And Coordination |
| Another House hearing on “Decarbonization Collusion” continued the right-wing anti-ESG rhetorical push. Background: House Judiciary chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) and other Republicans at the state and Federal levels want to prohibit companies from considering risks like climate change in investment decisions, through legislation and executive action. This week’s House Antitrust Subcommittee hearing was framed as an opportunity to “deter anti-competitive collusion to promote ESG-related goals in the investment industry.” But the “anticompetitive” angle is bunk, as Committee Democrats explained this week in a report aptly titled “Unsustainable and Unoriginal: How the Republicans Borrowed a Bogus Antitrust Theory to Protect Big Oil.” Committee Democrats apologized to the witnesses for the Majority’s harmful circus; Chair. Jordan (R-OH) repeatedly claimed that sustainable investing would somehow lead to a cap on hamburger consumption. Anti-ESG policies — pushed by Big Oil and GOP dark money — pour state funds down the drain, kill jobs, and drag down returns for investors, including public pension funds. Business leaders are widely opposed, and court challenges are advancing.
“The weakness of Chairman Jordan’s case, combined with the broader landscape of right-wing attacks on ESG, leads us to conclude that the Majority launched this investigation with an improper purpose; namely, to impose a cost on investors and financial institutions that take seriously the threat of climate change and to chill legitimate business activity.” – House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff Report (Rep. Jerry Nadler, Ranking Member) |
| | | | | | New Poll: Voters Want Politics Out of Their Business Decisions
New polling commissioned by the National Taxpayers Union and by Public Opinion Strategies shows: Nearly 70% of voters oppose bills prohibiting companies with ESG policies from doing business with the state. Nearly two-thirds said it’s “not OK” for state lawmakers to ban doing business with companies based on their climate-change or diversity stands. Three-quarters said state governments shouldn’t punish companies for business decisions. 92% said state lawmakers shouldn’t pursue personal agendas using taxpayer funds.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|